Throughout the listening to, The Verge reported that many involved residents took the chance to stipulate why they consider self-driving taxis are dangerous for San Franciso. A recurring sentiment was that town doesn’t want extra automobiles on the highway. It is exhausting to fault their considerations, as San Francisco is already one of the vital congested cities on the earth. Additionally they identified that these automated automobiles can cease in the course of intersections attributable to errors, inflicting extra visitors slowdowns.
Main as much as the vote, some metropolis officers sought to delay the listening to due to the numerous incidents of autonomous automobiles blocking emergency automobiles. Jeanine Nicholson, chief of the San Francisco Fireplace Division, advised the Washington Submit that there have been 66 incidents logged by the fireplace division of self-driving automobiles interfering with emergency operations. This contains blocking fireplace engines and inserting themselves into areas the place reside fires had been blazing.
In response to those considerations, fee president Alice Busching Reynolds acknowledged, “We do count on the AV corporations to interact with first responders, with legislation enforcement, with metropolis officers, and we do count on actions to deal with considerations.”
The CPUC defined that the self-driving automotive corporations have met all of the state’s regulatory framework obligations. That stated, commissioner Darcie Houck famous that if extra incidents happen, the CPUC may vote to limit or revoke the businesses’ newly obtained licenses.